![]() ![]() Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant 23 law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS a preliminary injunction. Before the Court is the question of whether to impose a 22 preliminary injunction in the instant case. The Court permitted the parties to brief whether a 21 preliminary injunction is appropriate here. However, the Court also ordered Defendant to show cause why 20 a preliminary injunction should not issue. 16 17 18 On April 23, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff’s ex parte application for a temporary 19 restraining order. 19-CV-02082-LHK Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION v. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 SYNOPSYS, INC., Case No. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |